| Newsletters - 2011 |
PDF |
| Illinois Appellate Court Holds That a Liability Insurer May Owe a Duty to Defend to an Entity That Does Not Qualify as an Insured |
|
| Learning to Recognize Conflicts of Interest: a Critical Prerequisite for Preserving Coverage Defenses |
|
| Insurers' Exposure for Their Insureds' Attorney Fees in Illinois Coverage Litigation |
|
| Recent Amendments to the Illinois Human Rights Act and Thheir Impact on Employers and Their Insurers |
|
| Insurability of Punitive Damages in Illinois and How a Punitive Damages Claim Impacts the Duty to Defend |
|
| Are Self-Insured Retentions (SIRs) Insurance or Not? |
|
| One Year After: How Pekin v. Wilson Has Changed the Duty to Defend Analysis in Illinois |
|
| When the Broker is at Fault: Special Statute of Limitations Frustrates Efforts to Reach Insurance Producers in Illinois Coverage Litigation |
|
| The National Forum for Environmental & Toxic Tort Issues (FETTI) |
|
| Illinois' Worst Insurance Rules Can Often be Avoided by a Well-Developed Choice of Law Argument |
|
| Illinois Appellate Court Answers Age-Old Question: What is the Legal Effect of a Certificate of Insurance? |
|
| What Liability Insurers Need to Know about Excess Exposure Claims Following the R.G. Wegman Decision |
|
| Beware: EEOC's Broad Power-One Claim May Lead to Another |
|
| Continuing Conflict and Confusion in the Illinois Standard for Determining Insurers' Duty to Defend |
|
| The Current State of the Illinois Supreme Court and What it Means for Illinois Coverage Law in the Future |
|
|
The following are copies of articles
written by our attorneys. We hope you
will find them informative.
